|

The Economist: The devil’s in the details (and the politics)

LIKE the weather, American politicians talk a lot about tax reform but do nothing about it. Which is a pity, because while Americans have been talking, other countries have been doing; since the late 1980s, top corporate tax rates around the world have dropped to a point that America’s, once below the international average, is now well above.

As this has happened, American-based multinational companies have shifted more activity offshore; their foreign employment steadily rose over the last decade as domestic employment fell. This is mostly because of the appeal of cheap labour and growing markets in the emerging world, but business groups and many economists think America’s tax rate is also to blame. Liberal analysts blame the tax code for a different reason: it allows multinationals to stash income in foreign havens and indefinitely defer taxes on it, encouraging the outsourcing of jobs.

Barack Obama claims to be ready to do something about it. Calling the present tax code “outdated, unfair, and inefficient”, he proposed on February 22nd a reduction of the top corporate rate to 28% from 35% (39% including state and local taxes). Previous analysis suggests such a cut would cost more than $700 billion (or 0.4% of GDP) over the next decade. Mr Obama would add to the price tag by making permanent a variety of tax provisions, such as the credit for research and development, that are on course to cost $250 billion over the next decade.

Mr Obama, however, pledged that he would pay for these provisions by eliminating enough tax breaks so that the overall plan would not add to the deficit. In theory this is ideal: lower corporate rates levied on a broader base would distort the allocation of capital less and provide less incentive for wasteful and tax avoidance.

But deciding whose tax breaks get closed is what makes tax reform hard. Mr Obama has called for, and proposed budgets that include, eradication of a dog’s dinner of loopholes covering inventory accounting, oil and gas production, corporate life-insurance policies, hedge-fund profits, and corporate jets. He would impose a minimum tax rate on foreign-source income. But this still leaves a lot of money that must be raised through other means. On the remainder Mr Obama sadly but predictably grows vague: curbing depreciation, the deductibility of interest, and the use of non-corporate business forms, such as “S corporations”, partnerships, and LLCs, should all be “considered”…….Read More

Short URL: http://cubanology.com/home/?p=7515

Posted by on Feb 23 2012. Filed under Current News, Economy, Post To Slider. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

*

120x600 ad code [mid col]
300x250 ad code [Inner pages]